Primary Navigation
From the desk of David Suzuki
I was recently in San Jose, California, to speak at the Third Annual West Coast Green Conference. It was a forum to display programs and products that are leading the green revolution. I was impressed by the number of booths (several Canadian) in the cavernous building.
Everything was "green" this and "eco" that, and there were a lot of exciting new products, for sure. But there was also a lot of "greenwashing"; that is, businesses bragging about some product or something they've done that seems green without a real commitment to what being green means.
Way back when the environment was in vogue in the late '80s, Procter & Gamble put on a show of being green by bringing out a reusable plastic shell to put plastic bags of detergent in, yet their big revenues came from Pampers, disposable paper diapers. That to me was greenwashing.
When scientists first raised concerns about climate change in the late '80s, fossil-fuel companies mounted a campaign of disinformation, setting up websites proclaiming it was "junk science" and sponsoring skeptics who also denied the science. One of the major contributors to that campaign was Exxon Mobil, which now has ads on CNN promoting research the company is doing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without ever saying that human use of fossil fuels is affecting climate. That is greenwashing of the most blatant kind. I believe that future generations will look on the kind of deliberate confusion put out by companies like Exxon Mobil as an intergenerational crime.
At the conference in San Jose, Nobel Peace Prize winner and former U.S. vice-president Al Gore said companies that promulgate the notion that human-induced climate change is not real are committing "fraud". I couldn't agree more.
Would you like to comment?
You must be a member. Sign In if you are already a member.
Contributors
Recently Discussed
- Where’s the real money?
21 months ago - Hand-washing signals shift
21 months ago - Who’s responsible for the global ma...
21 months ago - What’s up with this economy stuff?
21 months ago - We must listen to the scientists
22 months ago - When greenwashing becomes a crime
22 months ago - Strong leaders have open minds
22 months ago - We must elect leaders who care abou...
22 months ago - Why can’t politicians agree?
22 months ago - The fear factor: thinking on your f...
22 months ago
Recent Posts
- Let’s speak up for the country...
21 months ago - Where’s the real money?
21 months ago - Knowledge is power for 21st-ce...
21 months ago - Hand-washing signals shift
21 months ago - Who’s responsible for the glob...
21 months ago - What’s up with this economy st...
21 months ago - Putting humans in their place
22 months ago - True security means reducing r...
22 months ago - We must listen to the scientis...
22 months ago - My love affair with America
22 months ago
Page Options
1 Comment
I believe it is very important for people to know the difference. There certainly are alot of companies touting themselves as green when really they are the opposite. Like here in Australia, while the Labour party was in their pre election stage, their mandate was all about environment then after their success, Peter Garret neglected to follow up on his solar energy program and then continued to follow this "clean coal" program initiated by the liberals. Clean coal? Mr Garret, that certainly is an "oxymoron" and you are a definitely the latter part of that word.