Primary Navigation
From the desk of David Suzuki
By David Suzuki
Everybody uses the term sustainability these days, and that’s great. As biological creatures, we depend on resources and energy to live, as do all other species. For most of human existence, we’ve used materials from our surroundings: wood, animals, water, rocks, etc. Much of it was renewable. Nature replenished what we used. Today, we should use these renewable resources at a level at which they can be replenished year after year. We should use materials that aren’t renewable, like minerals, very carefully and efficiently, and we should recycle them.
Almost all species depend on photosynthesis for energy. That is, plants capture the energy of sunlight and transform it into chemical energy that they can store and use when needed. Animals like us exploit that sunlight by eating plants or animals that eat plants to recover that stored energy. We also release energy by burning peat, dung, wood, coal, gas, and oil, all of it some form of stored energy from photosynthesis. But fossil fuels are not renewable. They are finite, and now we are burning them on such a scale that the resultant greenhouse gas (CO2) is building up and trapping more heat.
We have also learned to use the energy of uranium in nuclear power plants, but uranium is also finite and non-renewable, and we have no known safe way to dispose of the radioactive wastes. So by exploiting fossil fuels and uranium, we are not only using up non-renewable resources, we are also bequeathing a legacy of problems for our children and grandchildren. That is not sustainable.
Furthermore, uranium and fossil fuels, especially oil and gas, are not evenly distributed over the planet. They occur in often highly volatile political regions like the Middle East, Russia, Venezuela, and Nigeria.
So when the crisis of climate change is focusing our attention on fossil fuels, we have a huge opportunity to shift to a truly renewable and more equitable form of energy, namely sunlight with its associated wind, waves, tides, and biomass. If the U.S. government can make a commitment of $600 billion to a war in Iraq (Nobel Prize–winning economist Joseph Stiglitz thinks the bill could be $3 trillion) and $700 billion to failing banks to ensure security, think of what it could do with even a fraction of those dollars to get us off fossil fuels and onto renewable energy. Now that would be true security from the geopolitics of oil.
Would you like to comment?
You must be a member. Sign In if you are already a member.
Contributors
Recently Discussed
- Where’s the real money?
21 months ago - Hand-washing signals shift
21 months ago - Who’s responsible for the global ma...
21 months ago - What’s up with this economy stuff?
21 months ago - We must listen to the scientists
22 months ago - When greenwashing becomes a crime
22 months ago - Strong leaders have open minds
22 months ago - We must elect leaders who care abou...
22 months ago - Why can’t politicians agree?
22 months ago - The fear factor: thinking on your f...
22 months ago
Recent Posts
- Let’s speak up for the country...
21 months ago - Where’s the real money?
21 months ago - Knowledge is power for 21st-ce...
21 months ago - Hand-washing signals shift
21 months ago - Who’s responsible for the glob...
21 months ago - What’s up with this economy st...
21 months ago - Putting humans in their place
22 months ago - True security means reducing r...
22 months ago - We must listen to the scientis...
22 months ago - My love affair with America
22 months ago
Page Options